Tulare County tap water: hardness, PFAS and lead

Tulare County, California has about 483,546 residents (Census 2024 estimate) and 91 community water systems in EPA records. The largest local system is Cws - Visalia, serving about 153,522 people from groundwater.

! 4 of 6 largest systems with health-based violationsPFAS detected at 3 of 6 sampled systemsHardness 1.8 gpg (low confidence)

Public-record figures, not a test of your tap. Not 100% accurate or guaranteed. Confirm with a water test, your utility or a qualified pro before you buy or act.

How hard is Tulare County water?

Cws - Visalia Estimate: untreated local water, not your tap · Low confidence

1.8 gpg (30 mg/L), soft

Tulare County: median of 1,631 results from 511 monitoring sites (streams and wells). Utilities may blend or treat water, so your tap can differ.

Source: Hard Water Map county data, samples through 2023

County estimates: Hard Water Map (hardwatermap.com), CC BY 4.0, derived from the USGS/EPA Water Quality Portal; file generated 2026-07-22. License

Public-record figures, not a test of your tap. Not 100% accurate or guaranteed. Confirm with a water test, your utility or a qualified pro before you buy or act.

Softener size at 1.8 gpg

For a 3-person home using 57 gallons per person per day and regenerating weekly, you'd remove about 2,155 grains between regenerations. Suggested size: 24,000 grain. This uses a low-confidence county estimate, so confirm with a test first.

Estimate only. Not 100% accurate or guaranteed. Confirm with a water test, your utility or a qualified pro before you buy or act.

Open the softener calculator with 1.8 gpg

Largest water systems in Tulare County

The 6 biggest of 91 community water systems on EPA records for this county. Service areas don't follow county lines; your water bill names your provider.

Cws - Visalia

CA5410016 · serves about 153,522 people · Groundwater

✓ No health-based violations✓ Lead below detectionPFAS detected (6 types)

Lead 90th percentile: <DL (below the lab detection/reporting limit; reported as 0) (period starting 2023-01-01) Older result. Action level: 15 ppb (drops to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027).

  • PFPeA: highest sample 34 ppt (2 of 85 samples); no federal limit
  • PFBA: highest sample 28 ppt (2 of 86 samples); no federal limit
  • PFHxA: highest sample 15 ppt (3 of 86 samples); no federal limit
  • PFOS: highest sample 6.9 ppt (4 of 86 samples); federal limit 4.0 ppt as a running annual average
  • PFBS: highest sample 4.3 ppt (2 of 86 samples); no individual limit; counted in EPA's PFAS mixture (hazard index) limit
  • PFOA: highest sample 4.2 ppt (1 of 86 samples); federal limit 4.0 ppt as a running annual average

EPA ECHO record

Tulare, City of

CA5410015 · serves about 72,241 people · Groundwater

✓ No health-based violations✓ Lead below detection✓ No PFAS detected

Lead 90th percentile: <DL (below the lab detection/reporting limit; reported as 0) (period starting 2024-01-01). Action level: 15 ppb (drops to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027).

EPA ECHO record

Porterville, City of

CA5410010 · serves about 63,487 people · Groundwater

! 1 health-based violation✓ Lead below detectionPFAS detected (8 types)

Lead 90th percentile: <DL (below the lab detection/reporting limit; reported as 0) (period starting 2023-01-01) Older result. Action level: 15 ppb (drops to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027).

  • PFOS: highest sample 23 ppt (13 of 58 samples); federal limit 4.0 ppt as a running annual average
  • PFOA: highest sample 22 ppt (2 of 58 samples); federal limit 4.0 ppt as a running annual average
  • PFPeA: highest sample 9.3 ppt (2 of 58 samples); no federal limit
  • PFBS: highest sample 9.1 ppt (5 of 58 samples); no individual limit; counted in EPA's PFAS mixture (hazard index) limit
  • PFHxA: highest sample 8.5 ppt (2 of 58 samples); no federal limit
  • PFHpA: highest sample 6.5 ppt (2 of 58 samples); no federal limit
  • PFBA: highest sample 5.8 ppt (2 of 58 samples); no federal limit
  • PFHxS: highest sample 3.6 ppt (4 of 58 samples); federal limit 10.0 ppt as a running annual average, also counted in EPA's PFAS mixture (hazard index) limit (currently in effect; EPA has proposed removing it)

EPA ECHO record

Dinuba, City of

CA5410002 · serves about 27,641 people · Groundwater

! 1 health-based violation✓ Lead below detection✓ No PFAS detected

Lead 90th percentile: <DL (below the lab detection/reporting limit; reported as 0) (period starting 2023-01-01) Older result. Action level: 15 ppb (drops to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027).

EPA ECHO record

Lindsay, City of

CA5410006 · serves about 12,659 people · Surface water

! 41 health-based violations✓ Lead below detectionPFAS detected (4 types)

Lead 90th percentile: <DL (below the lab detection/reporting limit; reported as 0) (period starting 2024-01-01). Action level: 15 ppb (drops to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027).

  • PFOS: highest sample 12 ppt (4 of 8 samples); federal limit 4.0 ppt as a running annual average
  • PFOA: highest sample 9.2 ppt (4 of 8 samples); federal limit 4.0 ppt as a running annual average
  • PFBS: highest sample 4 ppt (2 of 8 samples); no individual limit; counted in EPA's PFAS mixture (hazard index) limit
  • PFPeA: highest sample 3.6 ppt (2 of 8 samples); no federal limit

EPA ECHO record

Exeter, City of

CA5410003 · serves about 11,169 people · Groundwater

! 1 health-based violation✓ Lead below action level✓ No PFAS detected

Lead 90th percentile: 11 ppb (period starting 2024-01-01). Action level: 15 ppb (drops to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027).

EPA ECHO record

Public-record figures, not a test of your tap. Not 100% accurate or guaranteed. Confirm with a water test, your utility or a qualified pro before you buy or act.

A PFAS detection is not a violation. Federal limits (4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS) apply to running annual averages, with compliance required by 2029. In May 2026 EPA proposed extending the PFOA/PFOS deadline to 2031 and removing other PFAS limits; not final as of 2026-10-21.

Test your own tap

These are public records for whole systems. Your home's pipes, fixtures and any private well can change what you drink. A certified lab test or a hardness test strip gives you your own numbers. Then use our PFAS and lead filter selector to see which certifications to look for.

Common questions about Tulare County water

Is tap water in Tulare County safe to drink?

4 of the 6 largest systems here have at least one health-based violation in EPA records since October 2021 (see each system below for status). Cws - Visalia's most recent lead 90th percentile was below the lab detection limit (2023), below the 15 ppb action level. Public records can't guarantee what comes out of your tap, especially with older plumbing, so a home test is the surest check.

How hard is the water in Tulare County?

There's no published utility figure in our data, but untreated local stream and well samples in Tulare County have a median of about 1.8 grains per gallon (30 mg/L, soft). That's a low-confidence estimate of source water, not your tap, so test before you buy equipment. For a 3-person home at 1.8 gpg, our softener calculator suggests a 24,000 grain unit as a starting point.

Is there PFAS in Tulare County water?

3 of the 6 sampled systems listed here detected at least one PFAS in EPA's UCMR 5 testing, and 6 results were above the level of a federal limit in at least one sample. A detection isn't a violation: federal PFAS limits apply to running annual averages starting in 2029.

Which water system serves my address in Tulare County?

Most homes are served by Cws - Visalia or one of the other systems listed on this page, but service areas don't follow county lines. Your water bill names your provider, and its annual Consumer Confidence Report has the full test results.

More California counties

Sources for this page

Data as of October 21, 2026. Figures are copied from public records and combined with our own calculations; they can be out of date or wrong. Tapped Out isn't affiliated with any utility or the EPA. Written and reviewed by the Tapped Out team. How we calculate · All sources.